Benlee,
I get your point. You don't want to label Christians, who give a word that is not true, as false prophets. I understand many are sympathetic toward those who are just learning how to walk in the prophetic. I understand that.
I also understand you have very definite criteria for the false prophet.
1. cannot be a christian
2. preach another god
3. must be fruitless
I seriously question the whole concept of one "learning" to prophecy. I'm old enough to have witnessed the downside of this movement.
The learning to prophecy movement started with WOF, and then John Wimber, founder of the Vinyard movement began Holy Spirit seminars teaching people how to prophecy.
You have to remember that John Wimber taught that we should not be so bound to Scripture. He reasoned and taught that since the Scripture did not explicitly state every possibility, we should open our thinking to the Holy Spirit doing new things. This is how the barking, animal noises, etc., came to be, ie, it was a "new thing." With each "new thing" there arose a "new teacher" to explain and verify it's validity. Because of his teaching, the Signs and Wonders movement was birthed and gained credibility as Christians everywhere "learned" his style of "moving in the spirit".
I don't think that a Christian, who repents of his false prophecy is a false prophet. But if they continue to speak lies, and will not repent, then I believe they will become a false prophet.
What is the biblical term for a person who speaks in the Name of the Lord that which the Lord has not spoken?
Jim