Mat 12:29 Or else how can one enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house.
Mar 3:27 No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strong man; and then he will spoil his house.
i've never heard anyone else with this particular thought regarding the strongman
i was sitting outside and thinking on the strongman and the stronghold - what is the difference when i realized that the strongman is the one protecting the house, and we are the house.
what if in order to stop a person from being what God has called them to satan binds the person up so that he can then prevent them from doing the work of God?
so if satan - who is the thief wants to rob the house what would he do to the person
he would first bind up the one protecting the person who stands guard against satans attacks, then he would be free to wreak hovac upon the person
what makes this so different to me is that this is the exact opposite to any teaching i have ever heard on this topic - id always been taught the strongman was satan and that we had to bind satan - but in this description it is the thief coming in to rob the house
and satan IS the THIEF - Jesus woud never be described as a thief so why has it always been interpreted in this way?
if anyone else has a thought on this perhaps share, but this is the only way these scriptures now make any sense to me -
